The New World Order
This story was originally the second half of our White Paper “Economic Chernobyl.” We have divided that paper into two parts due to the added videos and time involved both in reading and viewing. In this section we made some projections based on the information in Economic Chernobyl. The question we looked at was: “why the deliberate destruction of the economy, and what is planned?” Our conclusion is that it is all a part of the march to the New World Order. Rather this is the New World Order! Remember that this article was completed in December of 2008. Now four years later we see how democratically elected leaders have been replaced by technocrats who continue to do the bankers bidding, and how the leaders of Spain, Greece, Ireland, Iceland, and Portugal, the so-called PIIGS countries have turned their back on the citizens, kowtowing to the banking elite. In this part we connect the dots for Europe and offer some in-depth analysis of what exactly the New World Order actually is…terrible, but vital information.
The “Country” of Europe
Jean Monnet is considered to be the founding father of European unity. As the head of France’s General Planning Commission he authored the plan to create the European Coal and Steel Community, forerunner of the Common Market. Although having a modest aim of centralized control of the previously national coal and steel industries of its members, it was declared to be “a first step in the federation of Europe.” Later the European Economic Community, or the Common Market, was created to facilitate trade between member countries. These organizations were later morphed into the European Union (EU) in 1993. Common Market began with the idea of knocking down trade barriers and tariffs so that all Europeans could benefit from the creative productivity of their neighbors. Political union although feared by some was dismissed as unnecessary fear-mongering. Never, Not so, came the reply. British Prime Minister Ted Heath for one, promised no reduction in national sovereignty. But the free trade area led to a community and the community to a union. In 2005 fears of a political union were sustained when the EU attempted to pass a Constitution, but put to a popular vote the French and Dutch voters rejected it. Those intent on political unification however, didn’t hear the voice of the people in the vote. “The French and Dutch did not really vote ‘no’ to the European constitution,” insisted Luxembourg’s Prime Minister, Jean Claude Juncker. And Germany’s Chancellor, Angela Merkel decided for them that “the constitution is still necessary.”
The constitution was then repackaged as the Lisbon Treaty and passed by all but one of the 27 member “states” (they already have stopped calling them countries). The Irish were forced by law to put the issue to a vote, and their 5 million voters scuttled the entire deal, which had to be ratified by all member countries in order to take effect. However, their rejection of the Lisbon Treaty was treated as the “wrong” answer. It was widely claimed that the Irish simply didn’t understand the treaty, and must have been confused. The European Commission President Jose Barroso said that EU member states should continue ratifying the Lisbon treaty. Not satisfied with the outcome, nor willing to accept the will of the Irish people the Unionists have been offered a series of concessions to encourage them to think about it again and have another vote.
They already have a common currency, a flag and a “national” anthem. Now all they need is a political union to go along with it.
This political union has not arisen spontaneously on the part of the people, but has been another long-planned affair by behind-the-scenes elitists. Never elected to public office, Monnet worked behind the scenes of American and European governments. After becoming a member of the National Liberation Committee, the French government in exile, Monnet declared the intention of forming a political union that supersedes national soverignty:
“There will be no peace in Europe if the states are reconstituted on the basis of national sovereignty… The countries of Europe are too small to guarantee their peoples the necessary prosperity and social development. The European states must constitute themselves into a federation…” His plan was to arrange this transformation economically first. “Via money Europe could become political in five years” and “… the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would … the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal.”
Democracy be damned. There will be a European state. The method is simple: economics leads, politics follows. Europe is the testing ground for the rest of the world. In the new world order countries as we now know them will no longer exist. They have served their usefulness and are no longer needed. Hence they will be discarded regardless of what you may think of your glorious motherland. Strobe Talbot, Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State in 1992 has let us know the future that awaits us: “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”
And, shades of Milton Friedman, Monnet advocates using the shock doctrine: “People only accept change when they are faced with necessity, and only recognize necessity when a crisis is upon them.”
Well a crisis is now upon us. Do we yet accept the change that is about to come?
A New World Order According to Our Leaders
What has happened to Europe is now in the process of formation for the entire globe. As a result of economic strife a new economic order will be ushered in that will purportedly solve the problems, and as we have already heard, those solutions will be global. Once we have achieved a global financial system linking all countries “mutual commitments [will] make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal.”
Indeed. This New World Order has been called for by the heads of state and leading international figures for many years. Here are just a few examples:
- Mikhail Gorbachev, while still premier of the Soviet Union, in an address at the United Nations in 1988 stated: “Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.”
- Every crisis is used as an opportunity to tell us it will give birth to a new world order. In his speech to the nation and the world on September 11, 1990, George H. W. Bush said: “Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective — a new world order — can emerge….”
- President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, is quoted in The New York Times (April 1995) as saying that the renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important “for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order.”
- At the Gorbachev State of the World Forum in October, 1995 former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski said “the new world order will emerge step by step and stone by stone.”
- Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995), the house magazine of the Council on Foreign Relations, said: “We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.”
- Internationalist Henry Kissinger stated in January 2009 that he had been struck to see how much the move toward a new global order has been enhanced by the recent crises. The chaos of the financial crisis he says is to be a segue for “constructing an international system.” Carefully framing his comments in global terms he continued: “There are so many elements in this world at the moment that can only be dealt with on a global basis. . . all of these issues necessitate a global approach, so you don’t have to invent an international order. So every country has to mitigate its pure national interests by the global necessities, or define its national interests by global necessities.”
Kissinger appears to be speaking from Bzerzinski’s notes — nations thinking in terms of global problems and mitigating their pure national interests because of global necessities. Although Kissinger and Bzerzinski are members of “opposing” political parties, their thinking is remarkably similar, and they curiously share a common globalist vision for the future.
- On the inauguration day of President Obama, Kissinger boldly said that “the alternative to a new international order is chaos”:
“International order will not come about either in the political or economic field until there emerge general rules toward which countries can orient themselves.
“In the end, the political and economic systems can be harmonised in only one of two ways: by creating an international political regulatory system with the same reach as that of the economic world; or by shrinking the economic units to a size manageable by existing political structures, which is likely to lead to a new mercantilism, perhaps of regional units.”
It is unprecedented that all the principal actors on the world stage are avowing their desire to undertake the transformations imposed on them by the world crisis in collaboration with the United States.
- Tony Blair’s speech to launch his Faith Foundation at the Time Warner Centre in New York on May 30th, 2008: “the characteristic of today’s world is change. The consequence is a world opening up, and becoming interdependent. The conclusion is that we make sense of this interdependence through peaceful co-existence and working together to resolve common challenges … we are [all] members of a global community as well as individual nations [which] means we must be global citizens as well as citizens of our own country.”
- David Rockefeller openly admits in his memoirs his involvement in bringing about a one world government: “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” (p. 405)
- French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel echoed Kissinger’s call but in more veiled terms early in 2009. Sarkozy: “In the 21st century, there it is no longer a single nation who can say what we should do or what we should think … we cannot accept the status quo.” And Merkel called for better-regulated financial markets saying that the International Monetary Fund has failed to regulate global capitalism. Consequently, she envisioned the creation of a global economy body at the United Nations to orchestrate the economic policies of all national governments. She stated that “[The system] cannot continue as it is.”
- At the same conference the European Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes, encouraged that “global rules” on government aid to companies would be “helpful.” In fact, Kroes admitted that “A closer network of competition systems is slowly emerging after decades of work.” (Decades? Apparently this has been in the works for a very long time)
- And that one world government will come one way or another according to a member of one of the most elite banking families, James Warburg: “We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.”
What is meant by these references to a “new financial world order” and a “new world order”? This phrase is being used as though it had a commonly understood meaning, but that is far from being true. Why then the equivocal language?
From here on the story becomes necessarily somewhat speculative. What exactly the New World Order and the New Economic World Order is can only be conjectured at this point. It is our studied opinion however that the explicit meaning of these terms will be immediately obvious to all people in the world in a very short period of time as the call for a New World Order is fulfilled. Our projections are based on circumstantial information that is available, not on wild speculation. Circumstantial evidence is, by the way, admissible as evidence in a court of law and juries can draw conclusions based on such evidence. That is what you will need to do. All that is required is to connect the dots. Following are some of the dots. It will be up to you to connect them and draw your own conclusions, which may be different from mine.
A New World Order for You?
The new financial world order paves the way for the new world order in which the activities of every day life will be dramatically altered from what we know today. This will include a paradigm change at a level that will affect every man, woman and child on this planet. Recall that the modern nation-state, along with fiat currency, wage jobs, and factory work were created to shift the dominant paradigm to what we have today. This was only one step along the path to total control. Upon reaching the 21st century the technology is available to make the control complete. The nation-state has served its purpose and is now an obstacle. It must be abandoned, discarded, and this has been long in the planning. Historian Arnold Toynbee back in l931, speaking before the Institute for the Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen said it plainly: “We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world.” A one-world government does not recognize sovereign countries, and indeed they have not been referred to with that word in the media for more than a decade. Have you noticed that nations are no longer referred to as countries, but they are simply called “states”, as though they were already political units of a larger government.
The new world order refers to a coming paradigm shift that is being planned on a scale similar to that which occurred leading us from the medieval period to the industrial revolution, discussed above. The new paradigm will give us new ways of living and specifically a different manner for the handling of our economic affairs. In order to bring this shift about the entire world landscape is now being rearranged.
For most people the phrase “new world order” typically brings one of two things to mind: a would-be global government superseding national governments, meaning the end of nation-states and national sovereignty, perhaps a global government run by the United Nations; or the efforts some believe are currently underway, operating through various loosely-knit groups such as the Royal Institute for International Affairs, the Round Table, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, and others, who have a hidden agenda to create such a global government. It could also be a combination of the two. The agenda itself is sometimes called the New World Order conspiracy.
Does such an agenda actually exist, or are statements about conspiracies to create world government nothing more than psychotic paranoia? With the advent of the internet the question has become quite easy to answer, for anyone who takes the trouble to investigate the claims. It is important to keep in mind that conspiracies are not something far-fetched. They regularly occur in business board rooms around the world whose members discuss in secret how to increase market share, profits and so on, often illegally, as cited above. Actually, it is a mistake to label the events of today as a conspiracy, which by definition operates in secret. While the initial efforts to build a new world order may have begun in secret, all the evidence is now quite in the open and easy to find. They even put it on their own websites and herald it from their podiums, because they feel that the plans are already too advanced for anything to be done to change the series of events that have been set in motion. It is now often called an “open conspiracy.”
I might add that the reason that many people do not take such claims seriously is because such notions threaten people’s false sense of security. Everyone must have a worldview from which they understand what this world is, who they are in relationship to that world, and a means of feeling secure. Without these things we cannot function. Typically most people take shelter of their government, their job, their family, their money, their position in society, and so on. These are the building block of our temporary ego, or false ego, in relationship to this body. These are the most basic of all needs as identified by Abram Maslow for example, in his “hierarchy of needs.” The Bhagavatam refers to these are ‘fallible soldiers’ because, however much we find succor in them during life, none of them can give us shelter at the time we need it most—the time of death. And during our lives if any of these suddenly fail us, say we find ourselves divorced, or lose our job without warning, we become quite traumatized because the loss threatens our very sense of identity. Therefore it is difficult-to-impossible for many to admit that our government not only does not provide the shelter that we need, but is in fact undermining the system that they have created for people to take shelter of.
Nonetheless a global collective awakening to that fact occurred on September 11, 2001. Given the huge amount of information available online: the timeline of events, the people involved, the victims, those who profited and other possible motives, the hundreds of unanswered questions, and the aftermath, a very different story is found from the officially offered version. By 2006 a full 84 per cent of Americans questioned in a poll by the New York Times and CBS News rejected the official story of the American government. They felt that either the government was illegally hiding something (a conspiracy by definition) or was actually involved in the events that killed more than 3,000 of their own citizens. Many highly educated scientists, engineers, pilots, firemen, on-the-ground witnesses, ordinary citizens, as well as hundreds of millions of concerned people all over the world, think that the explanation presented by the United States government, that Bin Ladin and associates plotted and carried out the aerial assault, is the actual “conspiracy theory”.
Suspicions of banking interests conspiring for global control have been confirmed by insiders. Dr. Carroll Quigley, a highly-respected senior-level professor of political history at Georgetown University, studied the inner workings of the global cabal. He wrote:
“There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years in the early 1960s to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies. . . but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”
He lays it all bare in the 1,300 pages of Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time. Therein he tells of the conspiracy for control and the means:
The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.
Many economists, investigators and writers have detailed how the captains of finance have created and manipulated the system to bring it to resemble what Quigley describes. Eustice Mullins and William Griffin have revealed the conspiracy and machinations behind the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank. Alexander Del Mar detailed the history of monetary crimes in a book by the same name, and F. William Engdahl has shown how every major bank panic was deliberately triggered behind the scenes by the banks themselves in order to further consolidate their grip on U.S. banking. The private banks used the panics to manipulate Washington policy including the private ownership of the Federal Reserve the United States’ central bank. Financial warfare is wielded skillfully by them, and there is plenty of evidence to allow us to believe that the present crisis is just the latest chapter of a long sad history of deliberately created crises to manipulate the public’s opinion and their acceptance of loss of freedom.
Through long years of planning and hard work everything has been orchestrated to create the global financial crisis. It is designed to bring the present financial system to ruin and the world into chaos so that a “new financial order,” a new international world order can be created under the direct and absolute control of the money masters. In other words, the looting of the world economy is a prelude to the coming World Bank and World Currency of the coming World Government. And what is that government going to be like?
Brzezinski tells of its personal character, and how the lives of people will become “highly controlled.” In Between Two Ages he wrote:
The technetronic era “involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled and directed society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values. This elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control. Under such circumstances, the scientific and technological momentum of the country would not be reversed but would actually feed on the situation it exploits… Persisting social crisis, the emergence of a charismatic personality, and the exploitation of mass media to obtain public confidence would be the steppingstones in the piecemeal transformation of the United States into a highly controlled society.”
Since I first wrote this piece more than four years ago the young man who produced one of the most explosive videos of all time, Loose Change, has set out to investigate just what is behind the words “The New World Order.” As with Loose Change this new piece of investigative journalism titled “The Invisible Empire,” has been made available online. It covers most of the ground we cover in this piece and much more and so we added it to this blog. It is long—more than 2 hours. But whether you watch it now, or later, we strongly encourage you to watch it, for by doing so you will understand much more clearly what is behind that expression, and what it likely means for you. Our article continues below…
Who wants to be controlled and dominated by an elite? Is this apsect of Brzezinski’s planning also coming to pass? Predicting the future is always a risky business, but we have the roadmap in our hands, and we can see that we have already passed several important landmarks along the way. When will we arrive at that destination is the question. If we are off in our predictions by a matter of decades so much the better. And if we are prepared and can see that future coming to meet us, perhaps then we will actively attempt to thwart it. Many however feel that it is already too late for that. Let’s look a little further into the possible future that awaits us.
What exactly are the “latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control?” This refers to the
Microchip Pioneer Dr. Jose Delgado was a Spanish professor of physiology at Yale University, famed for his research into electrical stimulation of regions in the brain. He began his research into the use of pain and pleasure for mind control under the auspices the fascist regime in Spain during WWII. Much of Delgado’s work was with an invention he called a “stimoceiver,” a radio which joined a stimulator of brain waves with a receiver monitoring electroencephalogram (brain) waves and sent them back on radio channels. The stimoceiver could be used to stimulate emotions and control behavior. According to Delgado, “radio stimulation of different points [of the brain] produced a variety of effects, including pleasant sensations, elation, deep, thoughtful concentration, odd feelings, super relaxation, colored visions, and other responses.”
Delgado developed a small three-channel stimulator which can be placed beneath the skin with terminal leads to be implanted within the brain. The instrument is solid state, has no batteries, and can work indefinitely. Delgado stated that “brain transmitters can remain in a person’s head for life.
Delgado was hired by the CIA in 1974 to experiment with miniaturized electronic implants in human beings. He appears to have been fully convinced that control of human beings was not only inevitable but necessary. In a speech recorded in the Congressional Record, Dr. Delgado, speaking as if a mad scientist from some science fiction movie boldly declared “We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. . . Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. . . We must electrically control the brain. Someday, armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.”
At least one report states that control of people through the use of implanted microchips has been accomplished using a device called the IBM 2020 Neural Implant. A confidential memo leaked from Intelli-Connection, a security division of IBM, stated that testing of implants had been successfully carried out in privately owned sanitariums. It further stated that they had entered into contractual testing of their product with a correctional institution, although such testing was illegal at the time. In these tests the implanted chip was capable of rendering subjects lethargic and prone to sleep for extended periods of 18-22 hours per day, to refuse recreation periods, to make them docile, even if provoked, and to completely disable them. 
Regarding plans to micro-chip people on a mass scale, Hollywood director and documentary film maker Aaron Russo has publicly stated that the ultimate goal of the elite is to reduce the population and give micro-chip implants to those who remain. This exposé by Russo can be viewed on Google Video. He says that these astounding revelations were made to him by Nick Rockefeller who attempted to recruit him into the world’s elite after he began his campaign to become Governor of Nevada.
(to see the entire 90+ minute video click here)
During one conversation, Rockefeller asked Russo if he was interested in joining the Council on Foreign Relations but Russo rejected the invitation saying he had no interest in enslaving people, to which Rockefeller coldly asked why he cared about the “serfs.” Russo asked Rockefeller what the point was, saying “you have all the money in the world, you have all the power you need, what’s the point, what’s the end goal?” to which Rockefeller replied that the end goal is “to get everybody chipped, to control the whole society, to have the bankers and the elite people control the world.” Russo was assured that if he joined the elite his chip would be adjusted to avoid undue inspection by the authorities.
Russo says that Rockefeller predicted an “event” eleven months before 9/11 that would trigger the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, that there would be an “endless war on terror where there’s no real enemy and the whole thing is a giant hoax,” so that “the government could take over the American people.” Rockefeller was cynically laughing and joking as he made the astounding prediction. Rockefeller was often keen to stress his idea that “the people have to be ruled” by an elite and that there were “too many people in the world,” and world population numbers should be reduced by at least half.
Such a bizarre concept may seem too incredible to some to ever become a significant reality, but there are dozens of examples of people accepting implanted chips for a variety of reasons. In 2004, Mexico’s attorney general and 160 of his office staff were implanted with tracker chips to control access to secure areas of their headquarters. The Baja Beach Club in Barcelona and other nightclubs around the world are already offering implantable chips to customers who want to pay for drinks with the wave of a hand and also get access to VIP areas of the club lounge. It is likely that people will be induced to accept an implant for the many benefits that would accompany having one, such as being able to avoid waiting in lines, watching lights snap on, doors open automatically, and money pop out of ATMs as they approach. Chipped people would never have to show an ID, buy a ticket, carry keys, or remember a password. They could leave stores loaded with packages walking past the cashiers. Asked in a survey whether they would get a chip implant to take advantage of such benefits, 24 percent of respondents said they would.
A recent law passed in Los Angeles required lost pets to be injected with a telemetry implant before being released from the pound. These implants are connected to the Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) system. If the pet is ever lost again it can be immediately located by GPS monitors. Similar implants can now placed into newborn children at many hospitals. The selling point to the parents is that the children can be easily located if they ever become lost. United States’ troops can also be implanted with telemetry chips so that their positions could be located on the field of battle to assist in rescue operations.
A Transformed World
As mentioned this is an open conspiracy. We are being told where we are going and can clearly see it if we want to pay attention. Another glimpse into the future comes from the United States’ National Intelligence Council, in their report entitled “Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World”. The authors of the report include the U.S. intelligence community along with leaders of business, prominent academics, powerful think tanks, and hundreds of other experts from around the world. We can understand by the very fact that they were consulted for this study that these people have played significant roles in bringing us to where we are today and are also involved in shaping the future. We are told that the study is not a prediction but more of a description of the factors likely to shape events. And what do they say?
- There is a prospect for a new Bretton Woods to “regulate the global economy,” and renovate the IMF, resulting in a new international system.
- The financial landscape will become “genuinely global and multipolar,”
- The dollar could lose its status as the global reserve currency becoming “something of a first among equals in a basket of currencies”
- By 2025, nation-states will no longer be the only—and often not the most important—actors on the world stage and the ‘international system’ will have morphed to accommodate the new reality. Although states will not disappear from the international scene, the relative power of various non-state actors will grow and influence decisions on social, economic, and political issues.
- Individual nation-states will be unable to resolve pressing transnational problems, and “the need for effective global governance will increase faster than existing mechanisms can respond.”
In other words, the solution to growing international problems resulting from current political and economic activities meant to integrate the entire world, is more of the same — further international governance overseen by the same interests that created the problems. Instead of retreating from the ill-conceived and ill-functioning international system that they are creating their solution is to further complicate the manner in which we live. Don’t be fooled into thinking that this is going to make things better. A not-so-hidden agenda lurks behind the do-gooders mask — a one-world currency, a one-world economy, and a one-world government.
The Underlying Objective
The new world order or new economic order is a new chapter in the plan for ruling the world. In the economics of passion we learned how the powers-that-be decided to change the manner in which people lived in order to exploit them further. With that began the concept of the modern nation state, an industrial civilization, the money economy, and wage work. But it was incomplete. There is still an underground economy flourishing around the globe that is completely off the books. People are still free to pursue their own ideas of what to do, how to live. The control isn’t complete. Now the technology exists for the control to be complete and total, and therefore it is time for a new economic order, and a new world order.
It is a fact that the demonic control this world and we know the nature of the demonic mentality – they want it all – another way of saying that they want global conquest and complete control. Everything they do is meant to take them closer to that goal. Therefore we can see the current economic problem, not as a problem per se, but rather as a means, a sub-goal, or even as a solution to an altogether different problem – that of global conquest – which I shall call the underlying objective. The underlying problem is never visible to the public because it is not the publics’ problem, nor is it to be understood by the public. It is the problem of those who control the world. It remains shrouded in mystery and hid behind lies. Such methods are the status quo of world politics. We need no better example than how President Bush used false-flag attacks, death, and lies to involve the United States in a protracted war without a clear goal in Iraq and Afganistan. Moreover, we are specifically told that there is no end to this war, and that there is not even a clearly defined enemy. Beware! He may show up at any time and in any place. He may even be us! The underlying objective is militarily control of the Middle East indefinitely.
If we understand the underlying objective we can observe the pattern of activities as they unfold to reveal the trend and the end-game. Understanding the goal we have a whodunit before the fact. The challenge is to thwart their plan and recapture control of the world for the protection and benefit of all. A small number of people are acting in concert to conquer the world. A similar number of people acting concertedly can save the world. The script has been written and played countless times. The only difference is that we are now part of the cast, and we will experience the result. This is not vicarious living through fictional characters broadcast on a wide-screen with surround-sound. After the bad-guys win we don’t snap back to a different reality when the trailer ends, the lights come on and we walk out of the theater. If the bad-guys win the hellish reality of the wage slaves of Bangladesh will become everyone’s living nightmare.
One writer describes our situation like this:
“The leaders have all conspired to bring about the “post-industrial revolution,” which is nothing less than the wholesale destruction of the Western industrial base, a planned Financial Meltdown of the West, the total liquidation of the middle class and a micro-chipped population. The people of the Western World are in the middle of a profoundly disturbing social engineering exercise. For the first time in history the Political Elite of a mature civilization is waging a campaign of aggressive discrimination against its indigenous populations.”
Despite what the leaders say and claim getting to that ominous future is quite a different task than just saying “new world order.” Yet it is very clear that this is the direction in which they want to go. Unfortunately there are very few people who understand the agenda, and fewer yet who will take action to avoid it. How many of us want to go there? Still it is clear that the entire world has arrived at a crossroads in time and a choice must be made now. If we do not make it with conscious intention it will be made for us and we won’t like the result. And to choose a different future is quite a different task than just saying “I don’t want a new world order.” Many people who understand the situation advocate armed revolution. Will that work? What then? What will the current system be replaced with? As we have explained in our book Spiritual Economics, the populace is so deeply conditioned by the gunas of passion and ignorance (rajas and tamo-guna) it is uncertain if they will be able to establish a superior system. And if they do, what is to prevent the demonic from again taking posts of leadership? There is a solution but to find it requires that we understand how this world works and the root cause of our economic problems.
 Declaration of 9 May 1950; European Commission. http://europa.eu/abc/symbols/9-may/decl_en.htm
 Irish to vote again if concessions agreed, David Gow, The Guardian, Friday 12 December 2008
 Strobe Talbot quoted in Time Magazine, July 20th, l992.
 Kissinger Calls For New International System Out Of World Crises, Steve Watson, Global Research, December 21, 2008. www.globalresearch.ca
 Henry Kissinger, The world must forge a new order or retreat to chaos, The Independent, 20 January 2009.
 Warburg quoted from a speech to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, February 17th, l950. Warburg is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations;
 Americans Question Bush on 9/11 Intelligence, 14 October 2006 http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/13469; see also http://newspolls.org/story.php?story_id=55; and http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2008-09/2008-09-10-voa59.cfm?CFID=90108346&CFTOKEN=71918681
 Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time, Carroll Quigley, Macmillan Company, 1966, p.324
 F. William Engdahl, Power of Money: The Rise and Decline of the American Century
 Zbigniew Brezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, 1970, PDF edition; p. 97
 Physical Control of the Mind, Toward a Psychocivilized Society, Jose M. R. Delgado, M.D., Harper & Row, NY, 1969, pgs. 89 – 96
 Congressional Record No. 26, Vol. 118, February 24, 1974
 Date of leaked memo October, 1995; Reported in The California Sun Feb. 1997
 Why You Should Get a Chip Implant? Paul Somerson PC Computing ZDNN, www.msnbc.com/news/316518.asp?cp1=1
 Ibid., p. 11
 Ibid., p. 12
 Ibid., p. 12
 Ibid., p. 81
 Ibid., p. 81